
This is a post from one of my writer's groups from JD Webb:
This is from Authors Guild written to members about Amazon.com's recent action:
Last week Amazon announced that it would be requiring that all books that it sells that are produced through on-demand means be printed by BookSurge, their in-house on-demand printer/publisher. Amazon pitched this as a customer service matter, a means for more speedily delivering print-on-demand books and allowing for the bundling of shipments with other items purchased at the same time from Amazon.
It also put a bit of an environmental spin on the move -- claiming less transportation fuel is used (this is unlikely, but that's another story) when all items are shipped directly from Amazon.
We, and many others, think something else is afoot. Ingram Industries' Lightning Source is currently the dominant printer for on-demand titles, and they appear to be quite efficient at their task. They ship on-demand titles shortly after they are ordered through Amazon directly to the customer. It's a nice business for Ingram, since they get a percentage of the sales and a printing fee for every on-demand book they ship. Amazon would be foolish not to covet that business.
What's the rub? Once Amazon owns the supply chain, it has effective control of much of the "long tail" of publishing -- the enormous number of titles that sell in low volumes but which, in aggregate, make a lot of money for the aggregator. Since Amazon has a firm grip on the retailing of these books (it's uneconomic for physical book stores to stock many of these titles), owning the supply chain would
allow it to easily increase its profit margins on these books: it need only insist on buying at a deeper discount -- or it can choose to charge more for its printing of the books -- to increase its profits. Most publishers could do little but grumble and comply.
We suspect this maneuver by Amazon is far more about profit margin than it is about customer service or fossil fuels. The potential big losers (other than Ingram) if Amazon does impose greater discounts on the industry, are authors -- since many are paid for on-demand sales based on the publisher's gross revenues -- and publishers.
We're reviewing the antitrust and other legal implications of Amazon's bold move. If you have any information on this matter that you think could be helpful to us, please call us at (212) 563-5904 and ask for the legal services department, or send an e-mail to mailto: staff@authorsguild.org
Feel free to post or forward this message in its entirety.
__________________________
Nick Oliva
Author, "Only Moments"
www.onlymomentsbook.com
I've been watching this
I also think there are potential antitrust and restraint of trade issues here, though it can be said in other areas (such as Wal Mart), that the store is big enough to force manufacturers to do a lot of kow-towing to precisely what Wal Mart demands--almost as though the store has more control that the producer of the goods.
There are multiple issues here: (a) forcing those of us who didn't go via BookSurge to go through it anyway when we sell books on Amazon, (b) taking away business from publishers who can't/won't cut a deal with Booksurge (at present, Booklocker and Publish America are still holding out), (c) potentially forcing traditional houses to use BookSurge for printing, (d) reducing overall competition and creating monopoly conditions, (e) forcing us to have fewer choices for quality/design/program issues. (Many people think that BookSurge does a sloppy print job.)
For those who haven't been following this story, check out the Writer's Weekly Amazon Information Clearing House. If you go to the clearing house page, you'll find two petitions, one aimed at Amazon and one aimed at the WA attorney general in an attempt to cause an investigation.
Like many, I see so many online buying alternatives that I don't know why more people don't get their books from outlets such as Powells and Barnes and Noble. B&N offers discounts (for those who become members) that are lower than Amazon's prices. For a print on demand book, which isn't competitively priced anyway, the $2 price cut (on my book, for example) makes B&N a better place for people to buy it. Even though iUniverse's books are selling on Amazon, I switched my links on malcolmrcampbell.com over to B&N anyway.
TF
P.S. What a warm and fuzzy feeling, seeing that BookSurge ad displayed here next to my comment.
I Think They Went Too Far
this time. They always have the alternative to not carry any book that doesn't conform, but that would cut off their nose to spite their face, unless that income is meaningless to them. I would think that they would not want the bad publicity and if I was Barnes and Noble I would be jumping all over this one to grab Amazon's suppliers and customers. The anti-trust and monopoly issues are a whole nother thing and I think they stepped into a deep pit of quicksand now.
__________________________Nick Oliva
Author, "Only Moments"
www.onlymomentsbook.com